One crime of forcing humans to drink water with a hazardous waste byproduct of smelting aluminum or making chemical fertilizer is children who grow up drinking it have lower IQs than children who drink real unadulterated with fluoride water.
“I’ll tell you what they don’t want.
They don’t want a population of citizens capable of critical thinking.
They don’t want well informed well educated people capable of critical thinking.
They are not interested in that.
That don’t help them, that’s against their interest.
They don’t want people smart enough to set around the kitchen table figuring out how badly they are getting F##ked by a system which threw them overboard thirty f##king years ago.
They don’t want that.
You know what they want?
They want obedient workers.
People who are just smart enough to run the machines and do the paper work and just dumb enough to passively accept all these increasingly s#itter jobs with the longer hours and lower pay, the reduced benefits, the end of overtime and the vanishing pension the minute you go to collect it.”
In the city where I live, the political whores
Tried to force fluoride on the humans.
The whores of city hall forced fluoride in the water supply on the next election cycle.
The humans voted it down.
The next election cycle the political prostitutes forced it onto the election cycle again.
The humans voted it down.
The whores of city hall then illegally used tax payer funds against the taxpayers to produce and buy adds in the newspaper, on all local TV stations and local radio stations lying their whored out asses off denying all the harms of fluoride and lying about “benefits” of forcing humans to drink a waste byproduct of manufacturing which rust out galvanized steel plumbing, does not stop cavities, discolors the teeth, causes cancer, brittle bones and stupid kids.
The got it passed the third time.
My question was who at city hall was getting blackmailed or bribed.
Now a generation later, taxpayer funds are still used to buy a hazardous material to dump into the water supply to make chemical war on humans.
ANYONE, EVERYONE responsible for forcing humans to drink this detrimental hazardous cocktail should be given a fair Nuremberg Common Law Tribunal trial and a fair hanging!
The Ole Dog!
‘Fluoride Lawsuit Against EPA Prompts Pending Release of Potentially Damaging Report’
Case reveals government attempts to limit available evidence about potential toxicity of water fluoridation.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) continues to oppose and delay a lawsuit filed against them by the Fluoride Action Network (FAN) to ban the use of fluoride in public water supplies in the United States.
The case has revealed government attempts to limit available evidence and avoid having the facts of water fluoridation reviewed in court.
A spokesperson with FAN told The Epoch Times in an email, “this represents a major reversal in the federal agencies’ position, and will ensure that the public has access to these critical documents that would have otherwise remained buried forever.”
Fluoride exposure has been linked to an increased risk of hypothyroidism in pregnant women and brain-based disorders in their offspring.
There are also findings that higher fluoride exposure is associated with reduced IQ in children.
From Petition to Lawsuit
The lawsuit began in 2017 after a petition filed in November 2016 called on the EPA to “protect the public and susceptible subpopulations from the neurotoxic risks of fluoride by banning the addition of fluoridation chemicals to water.”
The petition referenced more than 2,500 pages of scientific documentation detailing the risks of water fluoridation to human health, including more than 180 published studies showing fluoride is linked to reduced IQ and neurotoxic harm.
In its Feb. 27, 2017 response, the EPA claimed the petition had failed to “set forth a scientifically defensible basis to conclude that any persons have suffered neurotoxic harm as a result of exposure to fluoride,” and denied the claim.
The Toxic Substances Control Act passed in 2016 includes statutes that provide citizens the ability to challenge an EPA denial in federal court. Thus, in 2017, FAN, Food & Water Watch filed a lawsuit against the EPA challenging the denial.
After numerous legal delays brought on by the EPA the latest developments in the ongoing case include:
Judge Edward M. Chen of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California rejected the EPA’s request for a six-month delay in the trial.
Released internal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) emails indicate the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services assistant health secretary Rachel Levine and the National Institute of Health’s director Lawrence A. Tabak intervened to stop the release of the most recent study on fluoride’s toxicity by the National Toxicology Program (NTP).
Chen lifted a stay on the protective order that has shielded the NTP’s recent study on the toxicity of fluoride from release following a January 2023 issued subpoena.
Most recently, in a Feb. 3 meeting, the National Institute for Environmental Health Sciences agreed to post and make public NTP’s Fluoride Toxicity Report on NTP’s website on or before March 15.
The posted documents will include the most recent subpoenaed Fluoride Toxicity Report, comments provided by the Board of Scientific Counselors, the NTP’s subsequent responses, and a related meta-analysis.
It’s possible that these documents could play a major role in the second trial phase of the ongoing legal battle.
Government Agency Interference.
The EPA as well as the other three letter organizations need to be destroyed, they are all corrupt!!!