Worth passing along but I have to inject one thing.
In the piece it says this:
“The Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, for example, do not prevent acquisition or transmission of COVID-19.”
NO ONE, ANYWHERE ON THIS ROCK, NO “government”, NO SCIENTIST, NO “HEALTH” AGENCY CAN OR WILL PRODUCE A SCIENTIFICALLY VERIFIED IDENTIFIED ISOLATED PURIFIED STAND ALONE REPRODUCIBLE SAMPLE OF THE ALLEGED “SARS-COV-02″ ‘virus” claimed without real scientific proof TO ‘CAUSE THE MYTHICAL “COVID-19” “ILLNESS” “DIAGNOSED” WITH A PCR PROCESS WHICH THE INVENTOR SAID SHOULD NEVER BE USED AS A STAND ALONE TEST FOR ANY ILLNESS, BUT ONLY AS AN AID IN SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH.
Can you say SCAMDEMIC?
Can you say KILLER JABBED sheep?
The Ole Dog! who still has his balls, unlike most sheeple.
“One possibility relates to a distrust of government or belief in freedom that contributes to both vaccination preferences and increased traffic risks.”
As Sir Bedevere (Terry Jones) proclaimed in Monty Python and the Holy Grail, “who is this who is so wise in the ways of science?” Behold the authors of COVID Vaccine Hesitancy and Risk of a Traffic Crash, published by the American Journal of Medicine but authored by a trio in Canada.
Author Donald A. Redelmeier, M.D. (Doctor of Medicine), FRCPC (Fellow of the Royal College of Physicians of Canada), MSHSR (Masters in Health Services Research), FACP (Fellowship in the American College of Physicians) works in “evaluative clinical sciences” at the Sunnybrook Research Institute in Toronto.
Author Jonathan Wang, MMASc (Masters of Management of Applied Science) is with the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES) and the department of medicine at the University of Toronto. Which particular science Wang applies is not specified.
Author Deva Thiruchelvam, MSc, (Masters of Sciences) is also with the ICES and the Sunnybrook Institute, in Toronto. The profile does not indicate which sciences the author managed to master. Nevertheless, this trio set out to test whether COVID vaccination was associated with the risks of a traffic crash.
A total of 11,270,763 individuals were included, of whom 16 percent had not received a COVID vaccine and 84 percent had received a COVID vaccine. The cohort accounted for 6,682 traffic crashes. Unvaccinated individuals accounted for 1,682 traffic crashes (25 percent), equal to a 72 percent increased relative risk compared with those vaccinated.
“These data suggest that COVID vaccine hesitancy is associated with significant increased risks of a traffic crash,” (emphasis added) the authors contend. That does not betoken a strong case.
In their quest to apply science, the authors might have cited reasons why some people hesitate to take a COVID vaccine shot. Maybe it’s because the COVID vaccines don’t work very well.
The Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, for example, do not prevent acquisition or transmission of COVID-19. Joe Biden and advisor Dr. Anthony Fauci were shot up more times than a Toronto junkie, yet both tested positive. See here and here. That should be enough to make anybody hesitate, and the Pfizer vaccine raises another issue.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) sought court approval to delay release of the data used to approve the Pfizer vaccine until 2096, a full 75 years, in effect, a proxy for “never.” As attorney Aaron Siri notes, vaccines are now widely mandated, and those injured by the vaccine cannot sue Pfizer, which profits from its product. That was not true of the Salk and Sabin vaccines, which creators Jonas Salk and Albert Sabin gave away for free, and which proved very effective against polio.
MORE SHUT UP AND ASSUME THE POSITION: