Case at hand alleges that YouTube aided and abetted the killing of an American in coordinated 2015 terrorist attacks carried out by ISIS
‘ISIS Commander’ Arrested by Libyan Authorities Exposed as Israeli Mossad Agent
If her folks want revenge or money for her death at the hands of “ISIS, (Israel’s Secret Intelligence Service), they should sue Tel Aviv.
Of course the money they got would be American tax slave money as USA taxes Americans to fund Israel.
Treasonous whores are for hanging!
After Fair Nuremberg Common Law Tribunals of course.
Keep it legal.
The Ole Dog!
The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to weigh in on whether tech companies should be allowed immunity over ‘problematic’ content posted by users.
The case at hand alleges that YouTube aided and abetted the killing of an American in coordinated 2015 terrorist attacks carried out by ISIS, which killed 130 people. The family of one of the victims, Nohemi Gonzalez, has argued that YouTube’s active role in recommending videos overcomes the liability shield for internet companies enacted by Congress in 1996 as part of the Communications Decency Act.
Section 230 of that act absolves online platforms of liability from content posted by users – and has come under fire in recent years, with the right claiming that it allows companies to inappropriately censor conservative views, and the left saying it allows social media companies to spread dangerous right-wing wrongthink, CBS News reports.
Gonzalez was a 23-year-old college student studying in France when she was killed while dining at a restaurant during the wave of attacks, which also targeted the Bataclan concert hall.
Her family is seeking to sue Google-owned YouTube for allegedly allowing ISIS to spread its message.