Ancient Anomalous Human Skeletons: Humanity Could be Much Older Than We Think

Accepted history is US GRADE A UNADULTERATED BULLSHIT!

Take the Roman Bible.

There is a great flood which destroys all but a few humans.
The cock crows three times.
At the end of the era there is a great battle against evil called Armageddon.

Viking history or “MYTHOLOGY”.
There is a great flood which destroys all man kind but one person who repopulates the earth.
The cock crows three times.
At the end of the era there is a great battle against evil called Ragnarok.

The names of the gods and battles change, but we are dealing with the same history and prophecies.

Every culture all over the world has the great flood in it’s writings.

You have been lied to all your life.

Look at the ancient stone structures.
Today with all our heavy lift cranes and technology we can not build them.
But you are told people building ramps and rolling huge stones on logs built them.

Wake up and smell the bull shit!

The Ole Dog!

There are many reported human skeletal finds which are in discordance with current evolutionary beliefs dating back to anomalously ancient geological periods in the distant past, way before it is accepted that human beings ever existed.

One intriguing report surfaced in an American journal called The Geologist dated December 1862:
“In Macoupin County, Illinois, the bones of a man were recently found on a coal-bed capped with two feet of slate rock, ninety feet below the surface of the earth. . . The bones, when found, were covered with a crust or coating of hard glossy matter, as black as coal itself, but when scraped away left the bones white and natural.”
The coal in which the remains were found have been dated at between 320 and 286 million years old, which, despite a lack of supporting evidence and little information on the discovery, is certainly worthy of inclusion here.

The Foxhall Jaw
A better documented account of an anomalous find is of a human jaw discovered at Foxhall, England, in 1855 which was dug out of a quarry at a level of sixteen feet (4.88 meters) under ground level, dating the specimen to at least 2.5 million years old. American physician Robert H. Collyer described the Foxhall jaw as ‘the oldest relic of human existence’. The problem with this particular fossil was its modern appearance. A more apelike mandible would have been more acceptable despite its great antiquity, but many dissenters disbelieved the authenticity of the bone ‘probably because the shape of the jaw was not primitive’, according to paleontologist Henry Fairfield Osborn.

Buenos Aires Skull
A fully modern human skull was found in Buenos Aires, Argentina, in an Early Pliocene formation, revealing the presence of modern humans in South America between 1 and 1.5 million years ago. But once more, the modern appearance of the skull doesn’t fit with conventional thinking on human origins so was discounted on these grounds alone. Here we see a clear example of dating by morphology, and a distinct disregard of all other data, no matter how credible. The thinking is simple; if it looks modern – it must be modern. No modern humans could possibly have existed that far back in time so it must be ruled out.

MORE:
https://www.ancient-origins.net/human-origins-science/anomalous-skeletons-0011224

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

The maximum upload file size: 256 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here