“IF VOTING CHANGED ANYTHING THEY WOULD MAKE IT ILLEGAL”.
Ex-presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard has called out President Joe Biden for delivering what she described as a shockingly divisive speech on voting rights, and even some close allies in the Senate admit he went “too far.”
Gabbard, an outspoken critic of the president before she dropped out of the 2020 primary and traded in her distaste for the career politician for a guarded endorsement, has renewed her criticism of Biden, accusing him via Twitter on Wednesday of smearing his ideological opponents as “domestic enemies, traitors, and racists.”
The former Hawaii congresswoman argued that Biden’s speech in Georgia on Tuesday was even worse in terms of dividing the American people than the words of failed Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, who infamously said in 2016 that half of Trump’s supporters were “a basket of deplorables,” which some suggested helped deliver the vote to Donald Trump by alienating potential swing-state voters. Clinton has since said she regrets using the term, which some Trump supporters took on as a badge of pride.
Is Black America fed up with Biden? Civil rights leaders boycott POTUS in Georgia
Read more Is Black America fed up with Biden? Civil rights leaders boycott POTUS in Georgia
The president’s speech ripped lawmakers who refused to dump the filibuster to make it easier for Democrats to pass a controversial package of voting rights legislation. Challenging whether they wanted to be “on the side of Dr. [Martin Luther] King or George Wallace” or “Abraham Lincoln or Jefferson Davis,” Biden painted the debate over dumping the filibuster as a simple matter of good versus evil, rankling opponents such as Gabbard and allies like Senator Dick Durbin (D-Illinois) alike.
On Wednesday, Durbin admitted Biden had probably gone “a little too far in his rhetoric” in hammering opponents of his voting rights package, which includes the Freedom to Vote Act and the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act, as racist throwbacks to the pre-Civil Rights era. However, he argued that ditching the filibuster was necessary, because the Democrats couldn’t otherwise get anything done in the Senate.
MORE BULL S#IT FROM A DC INSIDER: