Despite 82% Miscarriage Rate among 1st and 2nd Trimester Pregnant Women after Vax, CDC Urges Pregnant to Get Vax

The CDC on Wednesday urged all pregnant or breastfeeding “people” to get vaccinated against Covid-19.

In an effort to scare pregnant women, the CDC said data suggest expecting mothers face an “increased risk of severe illness from Covid-19.”

“CDC recommends that pregnant people should be vaccinated against COVID-19, based on new evidence about the safety and effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccines,” the CDC said. “COVID-19 vaccination is recommended for all people 12 years and older, including people who are pregnant, breastfeeding, or trying to get pregnant now or might become pregnant in the future.”

The CDC said there is no evidence that the experimental Covid vaccines cause fertility problems in women or men:

COVID-19 vaccination is recommended for all people 12 years and older, including people who are pregnant, breastfeeding, trying to get pregnant now, or might become pregnant in the future.
Evidence about the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy has been growing. These data suggest that the benefits of receiving a COVID-19 vaccine outweigh any known or potential risks of vaccination during pregnancy.
There is currently no evidence that any vaccines, including COVID-19 vaccines, cause fertility problems in women or men.
“Pregnant people”

A horrifying study published in the New England Journal of Medicine reveals that when pregnant women are given COVID vaccines during their first or second trimesters, they suffer an 82% spontaneous abortion rate, killing 4 out of 5 unborn babies.

This stunning finding, explained below, is self-evident from the data published in a new study entitled, “Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons.”

Just as disturbing as the data is the fact that the study authors apparently sought to deliberately obfuscate the truth about vaccines causing spontaneous abortions by obfuscating numbers in their own calculations.

Originally brought to our attention by a Life Site News article, we checked with our own medical contacts to review the data and double check all the math. In doing so, we were able to confirm two things:

Yes, the study shows an 82% rate of spontaneous abortions in expectant mothers given COVID vaccines during their first or second trimesters.
Yes, the study authors either deliberately sought to hide this fact with dishonest obfuscation (explained below) or they are incompetent and made a glaring error that brings into question their credibility.
In other words, this study was almost certainly a cover-up to try to claim vaccinating pregnant women is perfectly safe. But the study data actually show quite the oppose. Here’s how:

700 of the 827 women were vaccinated in the third trimester

Table 4 from the study, shown below, reveals that a total of 827 pregnant women were studied.

Out of the 827 women, 700 of them received their first vaccine in their third trimester of pregnancy. This means 127 women (which is 827 – 700) received a vaccine during their first or second trimesters.

Out of the 127 women receiving vaccines during their first or second trimesters, 104 spontaneous abortions occurred before their pregnancies hit the 20-week mark. These are indicated as “spontaneous abortions” in the table.

In simple math, 104 spontaneous abortions (during the first 20 weeks) out of 127 women who received vaccines in their first or second trimesters calculates to an 82% rate of spontaneous abortions among these pregnant women who were vaccinated.

It is important to note that deaths of unborn babies during the third trimester are known as “stillbirths” and not spontaneous abortions. Thus, the spontaneous abortions could not have possibly occurred in women vaccinated during their third trimester, by definition.

Thus, the study authors dishonestly used the wrong denominator of 827 in their “spontaneous abortions” calculation, when they should have used a denominator of 127, which is the number of women receiving vaccines during their first or second trimesters.

Put another way, it is impossible for a woman who was vaccinated for the first time during her third trimester to have a “spontaneous abortion” in the first 20 weeks, since they weren’t vaccinated during the first 20 weeks (and pregnant women aren’t time travelers). Thus, those women shouldn’t be included in the denominator used to calculate the spontaneous abortion rate.

The authors of this study should receive an award in the category of, “How to lie with statistics,” because they apparently tried to pull a sleight-of-hand trick to make it appear that vaccines are safe for pregnant women. In reality, they seem to be killing more than 4 out of 5 unborn babies in the first 20 weeks of gestation, at least in this data set. (It’s a small set of 127 pregnant women, so we’d like to see a larger review of many thousands of pregnancies in order to get a more clear picture.)

Apples and oranges, lemons and limes


5 thoughts on “Despite 82% Miscarriage Rate among 1st and 2nd Trimester Pregnant Women after Vax, CDC Urges Pregnant to Get Vax

  1. David Weichelt says:

    Thanks John for this post!

    I checked your numbers and you are right. The NEJ article didn’t highlight these conclusions but you can take it from the data in table 4! It’s mostly early that these babies were lost (93% of the miscarriages were <13 weeks / in the 1st trimester). The CDC said it's perfectly safe for all pregnant women to get the mRNA shots, and sited another study that was from 6 to 20 weeks. They cut out the first half of the 1st trimester! Worst case they say they have 18% miscarriage rate when they do that. I'm thinking if we looked at that < 6 weeks we would see most of the losses. They are misleading people in that they say a normal miscarriage rate is 11 to 16% (when that number includes < 6 weeks where most of the miscarriages occur anyway). See: "Receipt of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines preconception and during pregnancy and risk of self-reported spontaneous abortions, CDC v-safe COVID-19 Vaccine Pregnancy Registry 2020-21".

    I'm curious if you can post about this. We have a problem here that the CDC is moving the goal posts and using selective data.

    • John Carleton says:

      The same “elites”who are saying everyone must take the kill jabs to “save their lives”, have been saying for generations a few billion humans need to be killed off.
      Henry Kissinger calls humans “useless food eaters”.

      The minions running The Who, CDC, FDA, AMA and such are no longer human.
      They sold their souls long since.

      Most humans are sheep and can not believe such evil exist which would purposely mass murder billions of humans including not only children but the yet to be born.

      It does.
      I have never been a sheep.
      I don’t like the evil ones, but I understand them.
      Don’t lead to long restful nights of sleep understanding what I do about this world.

      There will have to be Nuremberg style Common Law Trials for the ones who mass murdered humanity as well as the ones like MSM and some social platform people who are cheerleaders for the jabs and hid the damage they were doing.

  2. Dianna Scandrick says:

    I regret getting my vaccine! And I did have a miscarriage I was in the first trimester. 🥺 still experiencing other issues

  3. Just Health says:

    Hi John. I’m against the CV vax, it’s dangerous and unnecessary.
    But I need to let you know the interpretation in your article is incorrect.
    This happened because the people that put the study results together didn’t annotate table 4 very well, and when the table data is interpreted without context of the full PRELIMINARY FINDINGS paper, then people are drawing wrong conclusions. The table fails to mention that there are in fact 2846 people in the study that were jabbed 1st or 2nd trimester. Of those, only 104 were miscarriages, about 12 kids were born and about 2730 are still pregnant at the time of the PRELIMINARY findings. At this stage it’s a miscarriage rate of about 4%, which is less than the regular rate of 10% to 20% . The denominator you need to use is 2846, and the numerator is currently 104, but will likely rise, probably to at least 284 by the end of the study. ie, by the time ALL pregnancies are “completed”.
    I hope this is clear. I’m happy to discuss and clarify. In my opinion it’s good to oppose vaccination, especially for pregnant women, but inadvertently publishing misinformation doesn’t help the cause. Cheers. Just Health NZ

    • hoop says:

      I am confused…

      The Table in the Study itself seems to contradict your comment… in the notes – it clearly states directly ‘Data on Pregnancy Loss is based on 827 participants in the v-safe program…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 256 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here