Boycott of Anything Israhell is a right and a duty

Occupation Guvnor A-BUTT can not keep folks from freezing to death in a Charlie Foxtrot mismanaged Occupied Republic of Texas, will not protect Texicans memorials agaisnt yankee carpetbaggers, Mexico Firsters, or treasonous red Russian Khazarian Israhell Firsters such as himself, but he tried his best to make criminals out of Texicans who did not want to support the Holocaust of the semitic Indigenous Palestinians in their own Ancestral Home Land.

Jew is a religion, not a bloodline or a sub race of the human race.
The Jewish religion had it’s birth in the banishment of the Judean elites to Babylon to keep them from stirring up trouble.

The “god” of the Jews is not the Most High God of the Hebrews at the time of Kings David and Solomon.
At that time Yahweh was recognized as a Son of the Most High God, the protector of the Hebrew people.
After the death of Solomon and down the road a bit, the Hebrews turned their backs on the One True Creator God of love, wanting an angry war god to validate their evil, they chose to put Yahweh who was not God in as their god, wrote him in all the way back, erasing the Most High God, then putting words in Yahweh’s mouth to justify their war crimes, buggering little children, usury, slavery, and every other vile thing they could think of.

When the Judean’s rejected Jesus the Christ who was a Son of the Most High God, but who never claimed to be equal to the Most High God he was trying to get the Judeans (Biblical Israel was long gone by then) to return to, very soon the remains of the Hebrew people, (never one blood same as Americans are not one blood), ceased to exist as a people.

It was the Romans developing a slave religion for Romes conquered peoplers and countries which wrote Jesus in as equal to God, thus after appointing themselves as the only mouthpiece for the fictional Jesus of the Roman novel, the “holy Bible”, cobbled together in 325 AD at the Council of Nicaea from writings of 100 to 200 years after the Judea’s assisted the Romans in executing the Real Jesus the Christ for trying to klick the Romans out of Judea and to get the Judeans to repent and return to the God of their Fathers at the Time of Kings David and Solomon.

Using some truths of Jesus’s words to buttress the rest of the words they inserted into the mouth of their make believe meek pay your taxes to Rome and don’t fight back Jesus character, they created a slave religion.
The Vatican then hunted down and slaughtered millions of Christians who would not bow down to Romes Vatican’s little boy raping Popes and priest.

Not all Jews are Zionist.

There were Jews, Christians & islamics living together in relative peace, intermarrying, watching each others kids, sharing work in Palestine until the Ratschilds had England invade, steal Palestine for the Ratschilds.

Belfour Declaration, 1917, Ratschilds who run the UK, offered to drag America into WW 1 to save England which the Ratschilds had start WW 1, from defeat in return for UK stealing Palestine and giving it to the Ratschilds.

That neither the red Russian Non Semitic Mongolian Khazarian Ratschilds or UK had any right to Palestine bothered neither party.


look it up or watch this.

Texicans are the new Palestinians.

The Ole Dog!

The global boycott is growing despite attempts to criminalize it.

Israel’s efforts to demonize the Palestinian call for boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) threaten a venerable form of nonviolent resistance.

These efforts push for the censoring of Palestinian voices and those of our allies, undermining free speech rights and academic freedom while falsely conflating criticism of the State of Israel with anti-Jewish bigotry.

At first, Israeli leadership acted as if the movement wasn’t a threat to its occupation, the policies and practices of which violate international law.

But a decade after the launch of the BDS call in 2005, as the movement gained strength internationally, the Israeli government declared war against it.

Thirty US states have now enacted some form of anti-BDS legislation. Governments, universities and other organizations around the world have also moved to suppress the movement.

In 2018, a public school employee in the US state of Texas was fired for refusing to sign an anti-BDS oath embedded in her employment contract.

She was told that she could no longer work in the state’s public schools after she refused to pledge that she “does not” and “will not” engage in a boycott of Israel or “otherwise take any action that is intended to inflict economic harm [on Israel].”

In April of 2019, a federal court ruled that the Texas law was unconstitutional.

In February this year, an appeals court determined that a similar law in the state of Arkansas violates the First Amendment. The decision was the fourth made by a federal court blocking an anti-BDS law on free speech grounds.

Israel’s advocates are pushing a controversial “working definition” of anti-Semitism that conflates criticism of Israel with anti-Jewish bigotry.

That definition, published by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance, states that “anti-Semitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews.”

That straightforward definition is complicated by a series of “contemporary examples” of anti-Semitism that extend to discussion of Israel.

The IHRA definition has already been used to suppress Palestine solidarity in Europe and North America.

But like the attempts to muzzle BDS, this means of shielding Israel from criticism hasn’t gone unchallenged.

The Massachusetts House of Representatives recently rejected an amendment to the state budget which would have embraced the IHRA definition of anti-Semitism.

Earlier this year, the Progressive Israel Network – comprised of 10 organizations including J Street, New Israel Fund and Americans for Peace Now – urged against the codification of the IHRA definition into US law and policy or its adoption by universities and corporations.

Despite attempts to undermine it, the grassroots Palestinian-led BDS movement is growing.

Through academic and cultural boycotts, an increasing number of scholars and artists are rejecting invitations to participate in Israeli-sponsored events.

Others are strengthening the economic boycott through their example.

Late last month, Charlie Pillsbury and four other descendants of the founder of the namesake food brand – endorsed a boycott of the company so long as it operates a factory in an illegal West Bank settlement.

Call to action
Palestinian Christians – laypeople and clergy representing the historic churches of Palestine – joined the boycott call in “A Moment of Truth,” a profoundly theological document, a confession of faith and a call to action.

In the document, Palestinian Christians reject anti-Semitism and assure our Jewish neighbors that “we are able to love and live together … after ending the occupation and establishing justice.”

In the meantime, we declare that “our option as Christians in the face of the Israeli occupation is to resist. It is a right and a duty for the Christian.”

We add that “it is resistance with love as its logic … for it must find human ways that engage the humanity of the enemy.”

As Palestinians seeking to end Israel’s brutal 54-year occupation, we ask those who would vilify boycott: If not this means to resist injustice, what is left to us?

Rifat Kassis is General Coordinator for Kairos Palestine and Global Kairos for Justice


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

The maximum upload file size: 256 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here