Introduction and Summary by Dr. Gary Kohls
Should Medically-degreed physicians in the NIH, the CDC, the NIAID and the FDA (all of whom presumably pledged the hippocratic oath at the beginning of their medical careers) who then vigorously promoted the untested (long-term), experimental emergency use authorized (EEUA) Covid-19 Vaccines, be subject to the Nuremberg Code of Ethics?
And should they be prosecuted if found guilty, given the fact that the vaccine recipients have not been fully informed about the unknown long-term risks of the experimental vaccines?
“The Doctors Trial considered the fate of twenty-three German physicians who either participated in the Nazi program to euthanize persons deemed “unworthy of life” (the mentally ill, mentally retarded, or physically disabled) or who conducted experiments on concentration camp prisoners without their consent.
The Doctors Trial lasted 140 days.
Eighty-five witnesses testified and almost 1,500 documents were introduced. Sixteen of the doctors charged were found guilty. Seven were executed.”
Gary G. Kohls, Duty to Warn, April 30, 2021
Politicians and Health Officials. Prosecuted if Found Guilty
It is understood that politicians and government health officials as well as members of parliament who endorse the marketing of an “unapproved” and “experimental” drug, and/or give instructions to doctors and scientists pertaining thereto, are also liable to prosecution under Nuremberg.
Nuremberg also applies to the four Big Pharma companies (Pfizer BioNTech, AstraZeneka, Moderna Inc, and Johnson and Johnson) involved in the production and marketing of the experimental mRNA “vaccine” as well as the “philanthropic” billionaire foundations which are endorsing and financing the mRNA “gene therapy”.
And in this regard legal procedures should be formulated and implemented.
With regard to the so-called emergency use authorization (EUA), it is now established and confirmed (beyond doubt) by the WHO (January 20, 2021) that the entire data base pertaining to tabulation of confirmed positive cases (RT-PCR test) (since early February 2020 in 193 member states of the UN) is invalid.
This flawed methodology (which has been repealed by the WHO) cannot be used to confirm (with reliable statistics) the existence of an emergency situation.
Hence the emergency use authorization (EUA) criterion is totally invalid. Moreover, the criteria used to identify Covid related deaths are proven to be false.
Michel Chossudovsky, Global Research, April 30, 2021
Below is the text of the Nuremberg indictment
The Full Transcript at Harvard Law School
FROM THE INDICTMENT
Count One – The Common Design or Conspiracy
1. Between September 1939 and April 1945 all of the defendants herein, acting pursuant to a common design, unlawfully, willfully, and knowingly did conspire and agree together and with each other and with diverse other persons, to commit war crimes and crimes against humanity, as defined in Control Council Law No. 10, Article II.
2. Throughout the period covered by this indictment all of the defendants herein, acting in concert with each other and with others, unlawfully, willfully, and knowingly were principals in, accessories to, ordered, abetted, took a consenting part in, and were connected with plans and enterprises involving the commission of war crimes and crimes against humanity.
3. All of the defendants herein, acting in concert with others for whose acts the defendants are responsible, unlawfully, willfully, and knowingly participated as leaders, organizers, investigators, and accomplices in the formulation and execution of the said common design, conspiracy, plans, and enterprises to commit, and which involved the commission of, war crimes and crimes against humanity.
4. It was a part of the said common design, conspiracy, plans, and enterprises to perform medical experiments upon concentration camp inmates and other living human subjects, without their consent, in the course of which experiments the defendants committed the murders, brutalities, cruelties, tortures, atrocities, and other inhuman acts, more fully described in counts two and three of this indictment.
5. The said common design, conspiracy, plans, and enterprises embraced the commission of war crimes and crimes against humanity, as set forth in counts two and three of this indictment, in that the defendants unlawfully, willfully, and knowingly encouraged, aided, abetted, and participated in the subjection of thousands of persons, including civilians, and members of the armed forces of nations then at war with the German Reich, to murders, brutalities, cruelties, tortures, atrocities, and other inhuman acts.
MORE CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY BY THE MEDICAL EXPERTS: