Portrait of Queen Elizabeth I st REVALES SECRET SNAKE BRAGGING SHE WAS DESCENDED FROM LUCIFER

MORE FAKE “royals” NOT DESCENDED FROM THE REAL LUCIFER

OK!
Heres how it works skippy.
The “Royals” claim the right to rule from being descended from Lucifer, the Bright and Morning Star, The Bringer of the Light.

“I Jesus have sent mine angel to testify unto you these things in the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, and the Bright and Morning Star.”
Revelation 22:16

Not the fictional Lucifer of the Roman Novel called the “Holy Bible”.

In the case of the English bunch however, kings Edward the 4th’s and Richard the 3ed’s mother was a slut who could not keep her pants up when her Royal husband was away.
Lucifer’s Bloodline was broken right there, making all English or “British” monarchs past that point FAKES, FAKE royals, Fake commoner kings, queens, princes and princess.

Fake prince/Real Rat!
The Lady Di murdering scum iS from imposters.
Both Edward the 4th and Richard the 3ed were bastards, not sired by by Plantagenet Royalfathers.
This makes the present “royals” fake monarchs.
But this does show you who really runs the British Empire.


ONE OF THE frogs WHICH REPLACED ROYAL ENGLISH PRINCESSES

So as you can see, the British “monarchs” are just bad pedophilic commoner pedo actors in the Ratschild produced cluster f##k and child’s nightmare of the “British Royals” puppet show.

Necked child-escaping-from-buckingham

MOSSAD JEFFRY’S ISRAHELL (RATSCHILD) CHILD RAPE HONEY TRAP FOR DC POLITICAL PROSTITUTES AND PENTAGON ROPE CHEWING GENERALS. AND COMPUTOR GEEKS, AND FAKE “princes”

Furthermore, “humanity” should have grown spiritually by this point to where they understand no one stands between God and them, and if their soul is “lost”, they only have themselves to blame.

If human Kind can not learn to live I peace with each other, stop stealing, raping and robbing each other, the species is doomed and it was all for nothing!

The Ole Dog!
Where the line was not broken!~

Portrait of Queen Elizabeth I st REVILES SECRET SNAKE BRAGGING SHE WAS DESCENDED FROM LUCIFER

A mysterious image of a coiled snake has appeared in a 16th century painting of Queen Elizabeth I, the National Portrait Gallery has said.
The Tudor queen was depicted with the snake clasped in her fingers in an original version of the work, but it was replaced with a bunch of roses.
The paint has deteriorated over the years to reveal the serpent’s outline.
The painting will go on display at the London gallery on 13 March for the first time since 1921.
It will form part of the Concealed and Revealed: The Changing Faces of Elizabeth I exhibition, which runs until 26 September.
Original sin
The portrait was created by an unknown artist in the 1580s or early 1590s.
The gallery suggested the snake’s removal may have been due to the ambiguity of the emblem. It may have represented wisdom, but snakes are also linked to notions of Satan and original sin.
Dr Tarnya Cooper, of the Making Art in Tudor Britain project, said: “The recent technical analysis on these remarkable portraits has been critical to our understanding of Tudor painting.
“The portrait of Elizabeth I with a hidden serpent is a really unusual survival. Yet, it is difficult to know exactly why the serpent may have been originally included, or how common this motif might have been.

MORE FAKE “British” “royals” NOT DESCENDED FROM THE REAL LUCIFER:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/arts_and_culture/8550119.stm

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 256 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop file here